Featured Reseach
A sample of 542 EU CLO deals is used in this study. Called deals and static deals are excluded from the sample. Among the 54 managers with at least three deals in the sample, Bridgepoint Credit, Napier Park Global, RRAM and UBS AM stand out.
This file tracks Net Interest Margin (collateral gross coupon minus weighted average CLO tranche coupon) trends across 131 US BSL CLO managers, with monthly data dating back to March 2013. Select up to ten managers from the dropdown menus to compare manager-level margin trends relative to peers and the market average over time.
This file tracks reported WAS trends across 129 US BSL CLO managers, with monthly data going back to April 2013. Select up to ten managers from the dropdown menus, and the chart will instantly compare their spreads against each other and against the market average.
A sample of 414 deals from the 1Q 2020–2Q 2025 vintages is used, excluding static deals and those with a collateral factor below 0.80. Each deal’s underlying collateral weighted average spread (WAS) is adjusted for its weighted average price (WAP) as of 1 May 2026. The adjusted WAS also takes par losses into account.
The term WAS, or Weighted Average Spread, refers to a key metric used to assess the risk associated with the underlying collateral of a CLO. In general, a higher WAS may indicate a riskier collateral pool, as some CLO managers may seek higher-yielding but potentially riskier investments in order to achieve arbitrage. What is important is to adjust the collateral WAS for loan prices as well as par losses. The adjusted WAS is a very useful metric for senior CLO tranche investors when pricing senior tranches. For example, all else being equal, AAA investors would typically demand a higher spread if the underlying collateral WAS is higher after adjusting for portfolio prices and par losses. AAA investors tend to be less concerned about idiosyncratic risks and more focused on systemic risks. A materially wider collateral WAS may therefore imply a higher probability of credit losses. A sample of 334 deals from the 2024 vintage is used, excluding static deals and those with a collateral factor below 0.75. Each deal’s underlying collateral weighted average spread (WAS) is adjusted to reflect its weighted average price (WAP) as of 10 April 2026. The adjusted WAS also incorporates par losses.
US CLOs: AAA Reset Pricing and the Outlook for Spreads
If you are an investor and would be interested in trial access, the Basic content is available on a two-week trial once the trial subscription agreement is in place.
The table below presents the IRRs by vintage for fully liquidated US CLO deals from the 2012 to 2023 vintages, based on a sample of 958 deals.
Below are tables presenting the MVOC (AAA-B) and EQ NAV of EU CLO deals by vintage, based on asset prices as of 2 March 2026.
A sample of 133 deals from the 2024 and 1Q 2025 vintages is used. Each deal’s underlying collateral weighted average spread (WAS) is adjusted for its weighted average price (WAP) as of 2 March 2026. The adjusted WAS also takes par losses into account.
A sample of 106 deals from the 2021 and 1Q 2022 vintages is used. Each deal’s underlying collateral weighted average spread (WAS) is adjusted for its weighted average price (WAP) as of 2 March 2026. The adjusted WAS also takes par losses into account.
RRE 28 Loan Management CLO achieved a record tight AAA–BB pricing differential on 10 February. However, that record was quickly surpassed by Avoca CLO XXXV, which set a new benchmark in the 2.0 EU CLO market. With its AAA priced at 120 DM and BB at 445 DM — implying a record-tight 325 DM differential — and Mizuho acting as arranger, the timing could hardly have been better.
Over the last twelve months, according to SCI BWIC data, around US$56.2 billion of US BSL CLO tranches were placed on BWIC. AAA tranches accounted for close to US$29.0 billion of notional, followed by equity tranches at US$8.3 billion and BB tranches at US$7.2 billion, as shown in the table below. Single-B tranches remain the least liquid segment of the capital structure.
The table below shows the average annualised prepayment rates for each seasoned manager in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years of the post-reinvestment period (post-RP). The sample includes deals that had exited their reinvestment periods by 31 December 2024.
OHA Credit Funding 17-R (Oak Hill Advisors, L.P.) sets new records in the US BSL CLO 2.0 market: BB at 425 bps (tightest on record), AAA at 114.7 bps, and an AAA–BB pricing differential of 310.3 bps — also a record low.
