Basic Premium

How do CLO managers perform from a debt investor’s perspective?
What does the latest arbitrage landscape look like? Which managers consistently show higher post-RP prepayment rates? If you’re curious to explore our premium insights or would like a personal walkthrough of the website via Zoom, feel free to reach out at info@clopremium.co.uk. Please note, due to the proprietary nature of our research, we do not offer free trials.

Basic Premium

US BSL CLO Managers: Rankings Based on MVOC (BB)

Please see the table below for the list of US BSL CLO managers and the average percentile across at least 10 of their deals, based on asset prices as of May 28, 2024. It is also interesting to note that managers with a primary CLO blended DM print of below 190 bps are represented across the performance percentiles.

Basic Premium

Review: The Reset of AIMCO CLO 10

The pricing of the AIMCO CLO 10 reset was impressive. This reset is accretive, as the deal’s WACC tightened slightly from 177.6 bps to 176.9 bps, and an additional 5 years of reinvestment period were added to the deal. In fact, its reset WACC was the tightest year-to-date in both the reset and primary markets at the time of the pricing.

Basic Premium

EU CLO Managers: Varying Prepayment Rates in the Post-Reinvestment Period

While each CLO deal is different, understanding the historical prepayment rates during the post-RP for each manager remains highly beneficial. Analysing these rates offers insights into the tendencies of different managers, highlighting those who consistently achieve lower prepayment rates and those who tend to experience higher rates in the post-reinvestment phase. In particular, 12 EU CLO managers have kept their annualised prepayment rates in the single digits for the first and second years post-RP, as shown in the table below. Among them, 5 managers have so far demonstrated the ability to keep annualised prepayment rates in the single digits for the first to third years post-RP.

Basic Premium

Review: The Reset of Anchorage Capital CLO 7

The reset of Anchorage Capital CLO 7, managed by Anchorage Capital, was quite interesting in a number of ways. Its equity NAV was low (though in line with its peers for the same semi-annual vintage) before the reset, given that this deal was issued almost 9 years ago. Typically, a combination of a class X tranche and/or an injection of equity would be needed. If the deal were liquidated instead of reset, its equity IRR would register around 12%, assuming a par issue price. The decision to reset rather than redeem or sell the equity tranche on the secondary market suggests that this reset is accretive and more lucrative than a full redemption or sale.

Basic Premium

Review: The Reset of Madison Park Funding LIX

The recent reset of Madison Park Funding LIX, managed by CSAM, is accretive as the WACC remains largely the same at around 191-192 bps before and after the reset. Additionally, this deal has been extended by approximately 4.3 years, and its equity notional has increased by $11.18 million.

1 8 9 10 34
Page 9 of 34