Basic Premium

Independent, clear, and trusted — CLO Research Group provides actionable insights for CLO debt and equity investors.

US BSL CLO Managers: Rankings Based on MVOC (BB)

Please see the table below for the list of US BSL CLO managers and the average percentile across at least 10 of their deals, based on asset prices as of May 28, 2024. It is also interesting to note that managers with a primary CLO blended DM print of below 190 bps are represented across the performance percentiles.

Review: The Reset of AIMCO CLO 10

The pricing of the AIMCO CLO 10 reset was impressive. This reset is accretive, as the deal’s WACC tightened slightly from 177.6 bps to 176.9 bps, and an additional 5 years of reinvestment period were added to the deal. In fact, its reset WACC was the tightest year-to-date in both the reset and primary markets at the time of the pricing.

Review: The Reset of Regatta X Funding

This deal was issued in late December 2017 and enjoyed a favorable original WACC of 179 bps. Before the reset, its AAA tranche was amortized to a factor of 66.2% after it passed its reinvestment end date on January 17, 2023.

EU CLO Managers: Varying Prepayment Rates in the Post-Reinvestment Period

While each CLO deal is different, understanding the historical prepayment rates during the post-RP for each manager remains highly beneficial. Analysing these rates offers insights into the tendencies of different managers, highlighting those who consistently achieve lower prepayment rates and those who tend to experience higher rates in the post-reinvestment phase. In particular, 12 EU CLO managers have kept their annualised prepayment rates in the single digits for the first and second years post-RP, as shown in the table below. Among them, 5 managers have so far demonstrated the ability to keep annualised prepayment rates in the single digits for the first to third years post-RP.

Review: The Reset of Anchorage Capital CLO 7

The reset of Anchorage Capital CLO 7, managed by Anchorage Capital, was quite interesting in a number of ways. Its equity NAV was low (though in line with its peers for the same semi-annual vintage) before the reset, given that this deal was issued almost 9 years ago. Typically, a combination of a class X tranche and/or an injection of equity would be needed. If the deal were liquidated instead of reset, its equity IRR would register around 12%, assuming a par issue price. The decision to reset rather than redeem or sell the equity tranche on the secondary market suggests that this reset is accretive and more lucrative than a full redemption or sale.

1 40 41 42 66
Page 41 of 66